![]() |
![]() |
» HOME » ABOUT US » RULES » FEES » MEMBERSHIP » NEWS & EVENTS » ARTICLES » CONTACT US
Featured
Member:
|
| Custodio O.
Parlade is at present
of-counsel to the Parlade, Hildawa, Parlade and Eco Law
offices,
Vice Chairman of the International Chamber of Commerce Philippines,
Inc. and Chairman of its International Arbitration Commission....more.... |
Welcome to our website!The Philippine Dispute Resolution Center, Inc. (PDRCI) is a non-stock, non-profit organization incorporated in 1996 out of the Arbitration Committee of the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry for the purpose of promoting and encouraging the use of arbitration as an alternative mode of settling commercial transaction disputes and providing dispute resolution services to the business community. Its membership is composed of prominent lawyers, members of the judiciary, academicians, arbitrators, bankers, and businessmen. Read more... |
Contact us: Office of the General Counsel 12/F Allied Bank Center 6754 Ayala Ave., Makati City 0716 Philippines Phone: [63 2] 986-5171 Fax: [63 2] 817-6928 Email: secretariat@pdrci.org info.pdrci@gmail.com |
| Announcement | Announcement | |||
|
|
Philippine Arbitration Updates:ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation v.World Interactive Network Systems [WINS] Japan Co., Ltd., G.R. No. 169332, February 11, 2008 THE FACTS: In 1999, ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation [“ABS-CBN”] granted World Interactive Network Systems Japan Co., Ltd. [“WINS”], an exclusive license to distribute and sublicense the distribution of a television service known as “The Filipino Channel” [“TFC”] in Japan [the Licensing Agreement”]. In 2002, ABS-CBN, alleging breach, notified WINS of its intention to terminate the Licensing Agreement. WINS commenced arbitration pursuant to the arbitration clause in the Licensing Agreement alleging that ABS-CBN wanted to renegotiate the terms thereof to allow it to demand higher fees. The sole arbitrator thereafter appointed, after hearing, found in favor of WINS and ordered ABS-CBN to pay damages. Read more... Equitable PCI Bank v. Judge Oscar Pimentel, RCBC Capital Corporation, Sir Ian Barker and Neil Kaplan, CA-G.R. Sp. No. 93966, March 30, 2007: THE FACTS: A dispute between Equitable PCI Bank [EPCI] and RCBC Capital Corporation [RCBC] was submitted to arbitration under ICC Rules. The Philippines was the place of arbitration. Two of the three members of the Tribunal, Sir Ian Barker and Neil Kaplan, are foreigners and non-members of the Philippine Bar. EPCI moved to disqualify Barker and Kaplan on the ground that they are engaged in the practice of law in the Philippines and are therefore ineligible to rule on the merits of the issues raised in the arbitration. In a petition filed with the RTC of Makati, Judge Pimentel held: that the arbitral tribunal which includes a former justice of the Supreme Court and two foreign lawyers are not considered to be engaged in the practice of law in the Philippines. Read more... |